Academic social network ResearchGate aids debunking of stem cell study

Indeed, Madisch provides extended advocated the actual features of "post-review" over "pre-peer review".
ResearchGate provides located a clever contractual way to let researchers upload their own papers away from walled gardens with the conventional journals, along with it's expanding fast. "We possess the reach, we possess the engagement, we now have this great feature, as well as the scientific community is accepting us."


"This is precisely what I has been dreaming of," ResearchGate CEO Ijad Madisch advised me. That's a thing that should save other researchers a lot of time.

The excitement about Lee's activities upon ResearchGate led the actual startup to speed up the particular conclusion of your new feature known as open Review, that is designed to make it simpler for users to offer open up feedback in order to papers published around the network. And, although the actual dialogue about it took place more areas than just ResearchGate, the actual stem cell episode provides a good offer regarding validation.
ResearchGate, the 4-million-strong academic social network, features just scored any significant victory in its quest to show the research procedure upside-down " its platform proved instrumental in the debunking of a main stem cell study, which usually upon Friday resulted in a extremely apologetic roll-back from the Japanese institute in which place out the particular original study.. Here, for example, may be the original nature stem cell paper in ResearchGate, total using a red note on the facet for you to say it really is "non-reproducible".
The original research came outside in Nature, the particular peer-reviewed scientific journal, earlier this year. Stem cells hold great promise for that way forward for medicine, however, there is any large quantity of controversy around present harvesting techniques, specially when embryos are usually involved, and this could have provided any terrific workaround.
Rather compared to classic system, where a paper is actually published to a new journal just like Naturel along with pored over for weeks by a couple of reviewers, he really desires to busty webcam visit a system where all research is revealed openly and immediately " not only does this carry more eyes for the research, but in addition, it signifies that unsuccessful results get nearly as good an airing because the productive ones. the feature brings together the structured feedback mechanism together with commenting facilities.
Bill Gates likes this approach, that is why he features poured millions into ResearchGate. 1 regarding the correct secret researchers there features now had her study suspended, as well as investigations are underway with both Riken and Nature.

"The subsequent couple of weeks upon ResearchGate will be thus exciting," Madisch enthused. Inside its very first 50 months, 2 million publications had been extra towards the platform " the identical range is uploaded every month now, and 700 datasets are going up every day. "It forces your authors to supply much more data. This purported to demonstrate in which it absolutely was possible to turn typical blood cells in to master stem cells simply by dipping all of them inside a mild acid solution. One, a Hong Kong professor involving regenerative medicine named Kenneth Lee, employed his ResearchGate profile for you to publish his and his awesome students' findings, demonstrating an inability to get this system in order to work.

There had been an excellent offer of grumbling about the nature paper, yet Lee's ResearchGate publication provided the ultimate straw along with Riken admitted the actual original nature papers contained errors.

Validation
According to always be able to Madisch, researchers who have discovered it difficult to reproduce the outcomes of printed papers possess generally had difficulty getting just as much attention as these powering the particular published paper " the press, certainly, are usually keener to trumpet a new research which has been peer-reviewed than a factor that might result from any hater along with which journalists really feel unable to assess themselves.

Academic social network ResearchGate aids debunking associated with stem cell research ? Tech news as well as Analysis



As the actual feature wasn't available then, Lee began his reproducibility quest in ResearchGate's Q&A system, however the sped-up relieve Open Up Review caused it in order to be possible to end up being able to publish the actual efforts associated with Lee's team because format.

Open Review
"It's open, real-time and also transparent, and furthermore the authors could contribute," Madisch said. It's crucial that will you realize that it will be not and then debunk study " we also need to highlight positive research."
Unfortunately, even although the Riken institute's analysis promised great things, various other researchers located by themselves not able to reproduce the results

Write a comment

Comments: 0